Drhe is american Supreme court Declaring an eviction moratorium is illegal for tenants who have defaulted on rent payments. Congress was unable to agree to a change in the law, and accordingly the CDC extended the moratorium under pressure from the White House. The majority of judges decided that the EPA had gone beyond its remit. Three liberal left-wing judges voted against it.
It is unclear how many tenants are now threatened with eviction. While there was talk of as many as eleven million Americans, experts now speak of a few hundred thousand. According to a survey conducted by the Census Bureau in mid-August, nearly 1.3 million tenants consider eviction likely and about the same number of tenants at least as possible.
However, Congress approved about $46 billion in rental subsidies. At the end of July, only about five billion were recalled. The state and local authorities are responsible for the low volume of payments. However, the August survey also showed that nearly five million Americans failed to apply for grants despite defaulting on rent payments.
Homeowners argued against the moratorium that they would be under financial pressure to service their mortgage loans. Debt is growing on both sides. Rental debt is increasing, while landlords are forced to take out new loans to finance old ones.
lost date
The history of the moratorium on evictions is politically unreliable: Last year, shortly after the pandemic began, Congress imposed an eviction moratorium that expired in July 2020. The Pest Control then stepped in and justified its responsibility with a 1944 law regulating pest control. During times of a pandemic, she said, street renters can infect the rest of the population.
In previous proceedings, the Supreme Court had ruled that the moratorium on evictions was illegal without a statutory regulation, but granted a transition period until the end of July. Congress missed the deadline while left-wing members of Congress worked on the government to extend the freeze. After some initial hesitation, President Joe Biden forced himself to do so, although he still had doubts that the new law from the Pandemic Protection Agency would be legally enforceable. However, he saw an advantage in gaining time through the judicial process, as he explained in a letter.
The White House is now reviewing legal strategies at the local level to avoid evictions in states with weak rules for tenant protection.
“Food practitioner. Bacon guru. Infuriatingly humble zombie enthusiast. Total student.”
More Stories
“Greenwashing”: criticism of the host of the World Climate Conference
China begins major military exercises around Taiwan
New Zealand instead of entering the state parliament – Vorarlberg state elections –